Interesting Mike, thanks for the link. Will play with it and see what it comes up with.

Don't count on the information being accurate. Fish species in particular.
In my area it names a small Conservation Area pond (2 acres) but has the nearby (1/4 mile away) Conservation Area lake which is 600 times larger un-named. Also lists this lake as having walleye which it never has had, but fails to mention it has pike which it is full of.
The Conservation Authority website accurately lists species present so it's obviously they didn't reference the Conservation Authority.

They didn't even check their "Guide to Eating Fish" publication for help in identifying species present.
I'd like to know how much $ was spent on it when they could have made it more accurate by just accessing available information.
Even a link on each area to recommend corrections & additions would be a step in the right direction.
It seems to me they spent more money promoting the site then they did on accuracy of it.